HR 607 Is Part of Broader Broadband Agenda

We are receiving numerous comments from members expressing their concern over HR 607 - the "Broadband for First Responders Act of 2011" that was introduced by Congressman Peter King (R-NY) and six other representatives on February 10th. This bill closely mirrors Senate legislation that proposes to repurpose all 10 MHz of the D-Block at 700 MHz from commercial interests to public safety for use within a national interoperable broadband network. Please know that for different reasons, AT&T, Verizon and the public safety community want the D-Block to be repurposed for a national public safety interoperable broadband network. But to pay for the network, both bills seek an "incentive auction" for the broadcast spectrum with proceeds to be earmarked not for the general treasury, but dedicated to build and maintain the PS network, up to $10.5 billion.

One could make the argument that the Administration is more interested in securing the ability to hold an incentive auction to access the broadcast spectrum for national broadband spectrum needs rather than assisting PS, but that is another story all together. Given the deficit the government is running these days, the house bill wants to find a way to get the money back eventually that is being diverted from the Federal Treasury to PS (this has never happened before), so it proposes an auction of the vacated public safety spectrum in the 420-512 MHz bands 8-10 years afterwards. For some reason, the authors of the bill have failed to conduct necessary due diligence or have conveniently forgotten that business and industrial also operate in those bands. The public safety community is having trouble funding narrowbanding, how are they going to fund a relocation from the lower bands to 700/800 MHz?

I can assure you that the PS community is not a big fan of this proposed spectrum migration. Our readers should keep in mind that very few bills are approved and signed by the President, and those that are have significant amendments added to them. For sure shake your head, but nothing has been passed as yet, the bills have yet to move.

  • We use EWA for all of our FCC license applications. The staff at EWA provide outstanding customer service and do all they can to see that applications are granted. EWA does a super job of staying on top of situations that affect our ability to file license applications and serve customers. EWA’s Regulatory Call keeps us informed about what is happening with the FCC and their online systems.
    Brian S. Auker
    Triangle Security and Communications
  • It’s remarkable what we’ve been able to do with EWA’s support. It’s a collaborative effort that has allowed Midland to deliver unparalleled support to our customers. No one else has the depth of understanding of FCC rules, which has resulted in more application grants. Midland Communications has a profound appreciation for EWA’s advocacy efforts. It has allowed us to have a voice before the FCC.
    Paul Moore
    Midland Communications
  • It’s not just about finding frequencies. It’s about finding the RIGHT frequencies for that customer, and EWA excels every time at that. We would not be moving forward without EWA.
    Craig Sikes
    Mobile Communications America
  • The advocacy and regulatory issues are very important to our business, and, without EWA, we would have no voice. Nobody is speaking up for players like us in Washington except EWA.
    David Reeves
    P&R Communications
  • A Beep has been a happy customer of Spectrum Intel since its launch. It’s easy to use, the information is much more accessible, and the service includes extra features that other license activity reporting services don’t have. Spectrum Intel saves my team time each week.
    Frank Anderson
    A Beep, LLC