NPSTC May Have Spoken - But It Is Not Yet Over at 4.9 GHz

It may be a bit optimistic on NPSTC’s part to label its 4.9 GHz reorganization effort as the “National Plan Recommendations Final Report”. It’s not final by any means as yet. In comments filed late November solicited by the FCC in response to this “Final Report”, EWA recommended that the FCC should allow all licensees of private internal systems co-primary access to the frequencies designated for shared public safety/non-public safety use; and (ii) stated that it is confident that EWA and other non-public safety frequency advisory committees have both the capability and commitment to process 4.9 GHz applications in conformance with whatever rules and policies the FCC adopts.  As long as the technical criteria adopted by the Commission for the 4.9 GHz band are followed by all frequency coordinators, either public safety or non-public safety, every licensee will enjoy the appropriate level of interference protection and confidence that their 4.9 GHz applications were processed on an equal basis.

FCCA, IMSA and IAFC noted in a joint filing later, however, that it was their “experience with coordination of Sprint/Nextel vacated spectrum, in which business/industrial coordinators are allowed to participate, that many more problems develop with the addition of coordinators who are not part of the regular public safety coordination process.” EWA responded to this allegation that “the Joint Commenters provided no details about any alleged problems caused by non-public safety FACs, and EWA is at a loss to understand what they possibly could be. Indeed, this complaint is particularly odd, since none of the Joint Commenters have ever raised this issue with EWA, with any other non-public safety FAC to the best of the Alliance’s knowledge, or within the LMCC where such matters typically would be vetted. Before the FCC gives any credence to this unsubstantiated claim … it should require them to provide specific details of the ‘many’ problems that have arisen.”

  • We use EWA for all of our FCC license applications. The staff at EWA provide outstanding customer service and do all they can to see that applications are granted. EWA does a super job of staying on top of situations that affect our ability to file license applications and serve customers. EWA’s Regulatory Call keeps us informed about what is happening with the FCC and their online systems.
    Brian S. Auker
    Triangle Security and Communications
  • The advocacy and regulatory issues are very important to our business, and, without EWA, we would have no voice. Nobody is speaking up for players like us in Washington except EWA.
    David Reeves
    P&R Communications
  • A Beep has been a happy customer of Spectrum Intel since its launch. It’s easy to use, the information is much more accessible, and the service includes extra features that other license activity reporting services don’t have. Spectrum Intel saves my team time each week.
    Frank Anderson
    A Beep, LLC
  • It’s remarkable what we’ve been able to do with EWA’s support. It’s a collaborative effort that has allowed Midland to deliver unparalleled support to our customers. No one else has the depth of understanding of FCC rules, which has resulted in more application grants. Midland Communications has a profound appreciation for EWA’s advocacy efforts. It has allowed us to have a voice before the FCC.
    Paul Moore
    Midland Communications
  • It’s not just about finding frequencies. It’s about finding the RIGHT frequencies for that customer, and EWA excels every time at that. We would not be moving forward without EWA.
    Craig Sikes
    Mobile Communications America